|
Cruising Info Equipment Pages |

The allure of photovoltaic panels on board is extremely compelling: free electricity, without the noise or maintenance associated with engines or even wind chargers. But installing panels so you get the most out of them is not as simple as many folks think. A few simple tips will help you get the most out of your installation. Subjects discussed in this article include:
Panel Location
Something a lot of people don't realize is that it doesn't take much shadow
over your solar panels before they stop working. Solar panels today
typically consist of 36 cells. Each silicon cell contributes just under
half a volt (0.48v) when the sun is shining on it. But if a cell is
shaded, it becomes a (rather leaky) diode, so instead of contributing half a
volt, it actually absorbs almost 3/4 volt (0.7v). These numbers are
inherent properties of silicon, the main element in solar panels. So shading a single
cell decreases the output voltage of a panel by over a volt (~1.2v). This
is usually enough to effectively shut that panel down, so it's producing no current
at all. Certainly shading 2 cells will shut a panel down.
![]() Four 120 watt panels fit nicely above our davits, aft of the mainsail track. Note that nothing is allowed to shade the panels. |
So it's important to make sure that your panels get shaded as little as possible. Even a single rope over a panel will have a devastating effect on that panel's output. We often see other boats with panels under radar arches, or next to wind chargers, and the owners wonder why their panels don't put out as much as they expect. If you want to have a wind charger as well as solar panels, you have to make sure that the wind charger is as far away from the panels as possible, and no higher than necessary. If your panels are under your boom, make sure your boom is swung out to the side whenever you're at anchor.
Are solar panels really worth it?
Photovoltaic panels are expensive but they are getting more reasonable. We
paid US$550 each for four 120 watt
Kyocera
panels in 2001 ($4.58/W). In 2009 I see that we can get 135W
Kyocera
panels for about $420 in the US
($3.11/W), a reduction of 32% in 8 years. Each panel will give us about
40 Amp‑hours per day, or about
(40Ah/day) x (13v) x (30 days/month) = 15KW‑hours
per month. How long it takes to amortize that depends on how you generate your
electricity and how much that costs you. Those numbers are very different for each boat
but it's not hard to figure out (only 3 values are needed - see below). How much does it cost you
to generate a kilowatt‑hour using your current scheme? We generally
figure that the total cost of running an engine is about twice the fuel cost,
which makes things easier. For the purposes of these calculations, I'm
going to use a battery voltage of 13v, which is about our average battery
voltage.
For example, our alternators probably average about 50 Amps and the engines burn about 1.5 liters/hour. With diesel currently costing about $.60/liter, we figure it costs us about (2) x (1.5 L/hr) x ($.6/L) = $1.80/hour to generate (50A) x (13v) = 650W, or ($1.80/hr) / (.650KW) = $2.75/KW‑hour (very expensive compared to the $.10/KW‑hr we pay at home for domestic electricity). So it would cost us ($2.75/KW‑hr) x (15KW‑hr/month) = $41.25/month to equal the output of 1 solar panel. At that rate, we pay off a $420 panel in $420 / $41.25 = 10 months! OK, generating electricity with alternators on big diesel engines isn't very efficient, and we don't get 30 sunny days per month, but you get the idea. Plug in your own numbers for fuel cost, fuel consumption, and electrical output to arrive at your own amortization time.
But for us, the joy of not having to run an engine at all has been well worth the cost of our solar array. Plus, your boat will gain resale value by installing solar panels, as they generally don't wear out. Kyocera panels carry a guarantee that they won't lose power over time (like 20 years!) so your investment is protected to a certain degree, and they honor that guarantee. In fact, Kyocera has agreed to replace our panels (flying the refurbished replacement panels to Malaysia at their expense, after 8 years!) as they've had some problems with internal connections in panels sold in late 2001. That's quite an amazing commitment to quality, especially given these tough economic times. (Kyocera is NOT a sponsor of this site, much as we'd like them to be.)
How many solar panels do you need?
Practically speaking, most folks are limited by how much space they have for
mounting solar panels. So most will buy as many panels as they can mount,
and fill in any electrical shortfall with with some other generating system. So then the issue
becomes maximizing your watts/dollar. A casual perusal of the web shows
that the bigger the panel, the better your watts/$ ratio. So your best
bang for the buck would be buying the biggest panels you can fit on your boat. This is
what we did, and 120W
Kyocera
panels were the biggest 12v panels we could find in 2001.
![]() Both tilting and fixed panels mounted in different places on 50' (15m) Peregrinata |
Solar Panel Power
Most people know that Power equals Amps times Volts (P=IV, where I is the
symbol for current - yes, it's silly, but that's the way it is). So
Current equals Power over Voltage (I=P/V). Therefore, many folks think
that if you buy a 120 watt panel, you'll get 10 amps at 12 volts. After
all, I=P/V=120/12=10 Amps. But most of today's conventional solar panels
have 36 cells in series, and develop their maximum power at over 17 volts!
This is so there's enough voltage to run a charge controller, and also to allow
the batteries to get up to full voltage (15 volts if you want to do an
"equalization" charge on wet-cell batteries) even when the panels get
hot and their voltage droops.
Energy Budget - Consumption
Working out how many Amp‑hours of electricity you consume is tedious but fairly
straightforward. A spreadsheet will help a lot to tabulate and sum up your
results. Go through all the electricity consumers on your boat
(computers, lights, pumps, fridge, freezer, watermaker, etc), find out how much current each one of them
draws (consumes) individually and estimate how long they're active for each day.
Some things like water pumps are tricky but if you know how much water you
usually go through in a day and you can work out how many liters/minute your
pump pumps, then it's not too hard. Fridges can be even trickier but you
can wire a small battery powered clock to a voltage divider circuit to give you
run time (this is also a good way to spot trouble before it gets out of hand).
Leave autopilots and running lights out for the time being, or create another
spreadsheet for consumption while on passage, as
the numbers are likely to be quite different. That will give you an
Amp‑hour (or Amp‑minute) figure for everything on your boat. Add those numbers together
and you should have how many Amp‑hours (abbreviated Ah) you go through in a given day.
That's the easy part ![]()
![]() Basic mount above davits on a monohull |
Chris did this for us as part of a school project soon after we moved on board Ocelot and determined that the 4 of us used a bit less than 130 Ah on a normal day. He published his figures on the Consumption pages of his Energy Budget, along with some of the assumptions he made.
Energy Budget - Production
Figuring out how many Amp‑hours a solar panel will give you is much more
complicated. The problem is that the glass fronts of the panels are fairly reflective,
the panels are fairly temperature sensitive (they give less power in hot
climates, a fact not widely published), and even a little cloud will
dramatically affect panel output. Most quality panels these days use an etched
glass that minimizes reflections somewhat. If you mount your panels so they
tilt towards the sun, you can get more out of them.
If you go to Chris's
Energy Production pages, you'll see that our 120W (nominal) panels give
us just over 37 Amp‑hours each on a sunny day in St. Martin (where these numbers
were gathered). Our four 120W panels generate a total of about 150 Ah on a good day,
so we often have some surplus power to help carry us through periods of low
sunlight (cloudy days, etc). This works out fairly well for us when we're
sitting still or even day-sailing (when the few minutes of engine use at the
beginning and end of the sail help to keep the batteries topped up). It's a
rare day indeed when we have to run an engine for the sole purpose of charging
batteries. If we pull into a marina, we usually charge them for our
electricity! ![]()
![]() Hot cabin-top panels on Scud. Note boom pulled to side. |
How much will my panels give me?
Most cruisers know that equipment performance on our boats often bears little
resemblance to published literature, especially advertising literature. Advertisers
want to make their products look good, so they spin their prose to accomplish
that. But we've found that each
of our 120W (nominal) panels generates a bit less than 40 Ah/day into our
batteries on a good day. So I would think that if you take the nominal wattage of your
panels and divide that number by 3, that should give you a rough idea of how
many Amp‑hours each panel will give you on a sunny day in the tropics.
This is somewhat crude and approximate, but since it's based on empirical
measured data it's also probably fairly realistic (and I haven't seen anyone
else do this sort of analysis). I don't have any hidden
agenda here - I'm just trying to provide some useful information.
Passage-making
Note that our panels do not really provide enough power for us when
we're on passage (sailing day and night). Being a catamaran, we can't fit
a wind-powered self-steering system. Our targa-bar upsets the wind-flow
too much, so we have to use an electric autopilot. Our autopilot
consumes about 4 Amps or almost 100 Ah/day so our daily
consumption goes way up. Also, the panels themselves are generally shaded
by the sails for about half the day so they're generating much less power. This
means that we usually run an engine for an hour or so in the morning when we're
on passage, but historically that's only 7% of the time or about 25 days/year.
One possible solution here would be a towing or wind generator, but that's a whole new
subject.
Fixed or tilting mounts?
One of the biggest sources of power-loss in a solar system is reflection off the
glass that covers the cells. If the sunlight is reflected away, it's not
going into the silicon to make electricity. Most good quality panels now
microscopically etch their glass covers to minimize reflection, but there's
really no substitute for pointing your panels directly at the sun. There
are 2 problems with this: moveable mounts are usually weaker and more
expensive than fixed mounts, and the panels have to be adjusted by hand several
times every day, especially if the boat is swinging at anchor (although leaving
the panels horizontal should allow them to perform as well as fixed panels).
Note that, on land, the optimal angle to maximize output is to point your panels
south if you're in the northern hemisphere (or north if you're in the south) and
angle your panels to the same angle as your latitude. This will
minimize reflections over the course of the year.
![]() Common mount above davits on a catamaran |
We chose to mount our panels in a fixed, horizontal orientation above our dinghy davits. Our panels are big enough that they present a respectable amount of windage, and making them movable would have been pretty difficult. This minimizes our hassle factor, but does limit our output somewhat.
How do solar panels work?
Traditional solar cells are extremely pure silicon in an extremely uniform
crystalline matrix. One side of the cell has a tiny bit of boron baked
into it, and the other side has a bit of phosphorous baked into it. A
silicon atom has 4 electrons in its outer shell, while boron only has 3 and
phosphorous has 5. This means that the matrix on the phosphorous side has
too many electrons, while the boron side has too few. Sunlight hitting the
phosphorous side tends to kick loose these extra electrons, which tend to travel
through the silicon and fall into one of the electron "holes" on the boron side.
This produces a flow of current (electrons) which is picked up by thin metal
traces laid down on the surface of the solar cell. The cells are connected
in series to produce the desired voltage. OK, purists will scream that
I've glossed over some very complicated topics here, but this explanation is
only meant to give some insight to interested laymen. Those who want more
information can read it on
Wikipedia.
![]() Ocelot's panels from below |
The effects of heat on solar panel output:
How much current a solar panel delivers depends not only on how much light is
getting to the silicon, but also on how hot it is. This inconvenient fact is often ignored or glossed
over in promotional material. The specifications for our panels say they'll
deliver 120W when they're in 1,000W/m2 of sunlight.
Noon in the tropics will sometimes produce 1KW/m2
of sunlight so that's a reasonable number for manufacturers to use.
But the small print says that we'll only get that much power if the panels are
at 25°C (77°F). This is highly misleading, as there's no way that a panel
sitting in 1,000W/m2 of sunlight will stay that cool, especially in the
tropics. We haven't put a thermometer on our panels but they get pretty
hot, even though they're exposed to the breeze. The more reputable
manufacturers will publish a table or graph of how current (and therefore power) decreases as
temperature rises.
For instance, Kyocera's specifications for their 135W panels say that at more normal operating conditions of 800W/m2 of sunlight and cell temperatures of 49°C (120°F) their maximum output power drops by 30% to 95W, current drops by 20% from 7.63A to 6.1A, and the maximum power point voltage drops by 12% from 17.7v to 15.6v. This last is especially useful for correctly programming a maximum-power-point tracking regulator. One reason we like Kyocera is that they don't seem to be afraid to publish these more realistic numbers.
But from a practical perspective, it's important to keep your solar panels as cool as you can while still leaving them in the tropical sun. Don't bolt them down to the deck. Instead, mount them in places where they get good airflow around them, to cool them down as much as possible.
![]() Solar controller panel and battery voltage |
Solar Charge-Controllers
Solar controllers are essentially battery chargers, limiting the voltage that is
fed to your batteries so they don't over-charge. You can destroy a battery
bank very quickly if you over charge it for long enough, especially if you use
Gel or AGM type batteries. So a charge controller, while not strictly
necessary, is usually a good idea. Many basic controllers can be had for
$50 or so. A good solar controller will be fairly sophisticated and will
provide you with multi-phase charge cycles. First a bulk phase, where all
the power is fed into the batteries, then an Acceptance phase (often called
other things as there's no standardization) where the voltage is limited to a
pre-determined value, and finally a Float phase where the controller decides
that the battery bank is fully charged so it drops the voltage to about 13.5v so
the batteries stay full but not over-full. Good controllers will have
programs for all the different battery types (wet, gel, and AGM) and some will
come with temperature sensors for the batteries, as a battery's finish
voltage is temperature dependent. Also, a good charge controller should
not sense the battery voltage through the charging lines, as these may develop
some resistance (corrosion, etc) which will affect the controller's ability to
accurately determine the battery's voltage. We're talking small fractions
of a volt here. Instead, the controller should have separate sense lines
that sense the voltage of your battery bank but don't actually carry any
current. (Good alternator regulators and AC battery chargers will have
similar features.)
But the best solar controllers are maximum-power-point tracking (MPPT) controllers. These run the panels at their maximum power point (typically 15.5‑17v) and use a DC‑DC converter to then charge your batteries (13‑15v). The DC‑DC converter is typically better than 90% efficient, and it's able to give you more current into your batteries than your panels are actually producing. This sounds like magic but it's not. If your panel is producing, say, 6A at 16v (96W), the DC‑DC converter changes that to something like 6.6A at 13.8v (91W) to charge your batteries. Power is conserved (in fact, a bit is lost as heat in the converter) but there's still a 10% net current gain into your batteries. Most advertisers claim a 20% boost in current, but our experience is that you'll typically see more like a 10% gain. The main problems with these types of controllers is cost (expect to spend several hundred dollars) and that the DC‑DC converter is a switching type that generates RF noise that you'll hear in your SSB radio. We have to either turn our solar panels off or bypass the controller when we're using our SSB radio.
![]() Interior of our Solar Boost 50 Controller |
If you're always going to use all of the power that your solar panels generate, then a solar controller isn't strictly necessary. But most of us leave our boats now and then for extended excursions ashore. If you over-charge your batteries, you can kill them very quickly. Most solar controllers are fairly cheap and many provide some useful performance instrumentation (battery voltage, solar output, etc) as well.
What solar system do we have on Ocelot
Being a catamaran, we have a lot of relatively usable space for mounting photovoltaic
panels. Above the bimini, above the davits, above an aft-mounted
electronics arch, or even above the saloon are common mounting locations, but
we've even seen them bolted to the deck (which looks quite dangerous to both
panels and people). We've also seen monohulls attach solar panels to
their lifelines.
We chose to mount our panels above our dinghy davits, where they should even be out of the way of the boom most of the time. We had to remove our radar arch to accomplish this and move some VHF and GPS antennas around, but that was fairly easy. We strengthened the davits themselves because we didn't want them breaking if the dinghy was suddenly filled with water from a breaking wave (as happened to us north of Columbia). The forward end of the panels could be held up by our targa bar, so all we had to add was an aluminum bar at the aft end of our davits to support the back end of our panels. Electrical connections could go through the targa bar.
The width of our targa bar, 2.6m or just short of 9', defined how wide our solar array could be. The length was defined by our aft support at the far end of our davits, which was about 1m from the targa bar. The panels could stick out past the aft support if the panel frames themselves were strong enough, but total panel length shouldn't be more than about 1.5m or 5'. With these physical restrictions, it became apparent that relatively long and narrow panels would fit the best. Researching what panels were available in 2001, we decided on four Kyocera 120W (nominal) panels. They're each about 25.5" x 56" (.65 x 1.42m) giving us an array width of 102" (2.59m).
Our solar controller is a Solar Boost 50 from RV Power Products (now Blue Sky Energy) in California. It's really designed for RV use, not marine use, as the case is just painted steel. But it's a maximum power point tracking controller that provides us with a 3‑phase charging cycle and special programs for wet, Gel, or AGM batteries. It has separate sense leads, temperature compensation, a control head that shows us battery voltage, panel current, or current into the batteries, and it has lots of adjustments so we can tweak it just the way we want it. It was also one of the very few maximum power point tracking controllers available when we were looking back in 2001. It has worked very well for us ever since we installed it in early 2002. The only problem we've had (besides a bit of rust on the case) is that it generates enough RF that we have to turn it off when we use our SSB radio, but we've found that we have to turn ALL our DC‑DC converters off, including our computer power supplies, fridge motors, and small inverters, as they all generate a fair amount of RF.
Equipment Pages:
Cruising Info:
Top Level: Home | Destinations | Cruising Info | Underwater | Boat Guests | Ocelot | Sue | Jon | Amanda | Chris | Site Map | Make a Comment
| This site is sponsored by: |
![]() |
Copyright © 2000‑2013 Jon and Sue Hacking -- HackingFamily.com, svOcelot.com. All rights reserved.